Height anxiety – a term in the field of psychology

1711604214644724

Height anxiety refers to the anxiety people feel about their height due to societal pressures. It manifests as purchasing various height-enhancing products and even going to hospitals seeking height-increasing treatments. Height anxiety is related to commercial and social cultural influences, often misleading consumers into commercial traps or contributing to societal value biases.

As living standards improve, children’s heights are gradually increasing. Influenced by societal expectations, parents’ expectations for their children’s height are rising, creating what seems like an “era of fear of short stature.” Their children’s short stature has become a source of great distress for many parents—this is the so-called “height anxiety.” However, there are objective laws governing a person’s natural growth rate that cannot be defied. Instead of instilling the misconception that “the taller the better,” we should create a healthy living environment where children can exercise more, connect with nature, and develop freely in body and mind, allowing their natural development to take place. If we simply try to force growth, while height may increase, psychological maturity may not keep pace, ultimately leading to a severe imbalance between a child’s physical and psychological development.

Causes

Height Anxiety

Some observers say that the current societal phenomenon of “height anxiety” is largely a product of unhealthy commercial culture. Some businessmen exploit people’s fear of being short and lack of knowledge, setting up a series of commercial traps that deceive many parents and children. One netizen commented, “Only businesses are left advocating for being as tall as possible; otherwise, how would those shops selling height-increasing insoles and various so-called miraculous height-increasing devices survive?”

Utilitarian Purposes

Cultural scholar Tao Dongfeng once said that the culture of a consumer society is a culture of the body, the economy of a consumer society is a body economy, and the aesthetics of a consumer society are body aesthetics. However, people’s focus on appearance still largely serves utilitarian purposes, such as increasing their competitiveness in the job and marriage markets, and increasing their “physical capital.”

The Phenomenon

Height Anxiety On June 30, 2015, Wang Guoqiang, Vice Minister of the National Health and Family Planning Commission and Director of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, introduced that the average height of adult men and women aged 18 and above in China was 167.1cm and 155.8cm respectively, and the average weight was 66.2kg and 57.3kg respectively. Compared with 2002, both the height and weight of residents have increased. Comparing the data and looking at oneself in the mirror, there are both joys and sorrows.

In a time when tall, handsome, and wealthy people are envied, ignoring the difference in height is nothing more than an Ah Q mentality: We see how Pan Changjiang, a comedian on the Spring Festival Gala, has been humiliated year after year because of his height. In 2011, Wannan Medical College in Anhui Province recruited master’s graduates and actually called applicants aside to measure their height; men shorter than 170cm and women shorter than 160cm were prohibited from participating in the written test.

Although the average height of Chinese people has increased rapidly in recent years, the commercial hype and misleading ideas about “height” have almost simultaneously occurred. Height has become linked to workplace competitiveness, mate selection criteria, and even personal charm. Height is no longer an isolated statistic; its numerical “backdrop” reflects a multitude of issues, including living environment, economic status, welfare, health awareness, body culture, and height discrimination—all worthy of serious consideration.

Main Impacts

Social Factors

Height Anxiety

Height anxiety is an individual issue, but when the height of a group changes, things change. According to media reports, starting February 1, 2015, the height requirement for free admission to scenic spots in Jiangsu Province increased, granting free admission to children aged 6 and under or under 1.4 meters tall. In many parts of China, the height requirement for free admission for children is generally under 1.3 meters, and some even under 1.2 meters.

परिणाम के चौथे राष्ट्रीय बच्चों के शारीरिक सर्वेक्षण द्वारा जारी स्वास्थ्य मंत्रालय ने 31 दिसंबर, 2006 से पता चला है कि औसत ऊंचाई के बच्चों की वृद्धि हुई, 6 सेंटीमीटर से अधिक 30 साल. स्पष्ट रूप से, बच्चों को कर रहे हैं "तेजी से बढ़ रहा है," और ऊंचाई सीमा के लिए मुफ्त टिकट भी चाहिए "बढ़ता है." इस के लिए एक आवश्यकता है, शहरी प्रबंधन के समक्ष रखी द्वारा आबादी में परिवर्तन की ऊंचाई. अगर ऊंचाई की सीमा नहीं है वास्तविकता के लिए अनुकूल बदलने की आबादी की शारीरिक स्थिति और हठ मना कर दिया ऊंचाई बढ़ाने के लिए, यह अनिवार्य रूप से कारण एक बड़ा सामाजिक प्रतिक्रिया.

वास्तव में, के रूप में जल्दी 2008 के रूप में, रेल मंत्रालय के जारी एक नोटिस "पर समायोजन ऊंचाई सीमा के लिए बच्चों के टिकट," ऊपरी सीमा बढ़ाने के मानक ऊंचाई के लिए बच्चों के लिए पात्र आधे मूल्य में टिकट से 1.4 मीटर करने के लिए 1.5 मीटर की दूरी पर । इससे पता चलता है कि ऊंचाई अलग नहीं है; यह एक सामाजिक आयाम है कुछ निश्चित परिस्थितियों में ।

People generally admire and encourage tall and strong individuals, and tall stature has become a form of worship. However, increased height also hides certain social risks. Studies have shown that for every 5 centimeters increase in a person’s height, even without an increase in population, the increase in height alone would require an additional 10% of clothing and 16% of food supply. It is said that if feet were one-third larger, the United States would need to use an additional 10,000 square kilometers of leather annually to produce shoes. MIT futurist Melzley warns that people often only notice the crises brought to the world by population growth, failing to recognize the impact of increasing human height on the living environment. Moreover, changes in height pose a challenge to public facilities. For example, the height and seating of buses and public restrooms, the ceiling height of department stores, elevator specifications, and even the sizes of bed sheets and clothing need to be redesigned or modified.

Height Culture

एक बार के लिए, वहाँ था एक नहीं बल्कि अशिष्ट कार्यकाल में समाज के नीचे के लोगों के लिए एक निश्चित ऊंचाई: "द्वितीय श्रेणी के विकलांग।" इस अवधि में लगभग के स्तर पर पहुंच गया भेदभाव, लेकिन अंतर्निहित सांस्कृतिक पृष्ठभूमि गहरा है । एक सर्वेक्षण में कहा महिलाओं के बारे में उनकी आदर्श "सही आदमी है," सहित 30 मापदंड इस तरह के आय के रूप में, कार में, भोजन, कपड़े, और स्वच्छता की आदतों । लगभग सभी उत्तरदाताओं परिभाषित किया गया है "सही आदमी" के रूप में 1.83 मीटर लंबा, अन्य विकल्पों के साथ चुना व्यक्तिगत पसंद के अनुसार.

When people’s aesthetic standards for the body are overly biased towards height, this deviation often leads to absurd situations. It was reported that a restaurant in Haidian District, Beijing, once advertised for security guards, specifying a monthly salary of 800 yuan for those over 1.80 meters tall and 600 yuan for those under 1.80 meters. In this way, height and status were equated.

जनवरी 2002 में, एक राष्ट्रीय स्तर पर प्रसिद्ध मुकदमा हुई । जियांग ताओ, एक कानून से स्नातक सिचुआन विश्वविद्यालय, अस्वीकार कर दिया गया था के लिए एक सरकारी नौकरी के कारण उसकी ऊंचाई. एक साक्षात्कार में, जियांग ताओ ने कहा है कि हालांकि वह था केवल 1.65 मीटर लंबा, वह उत्कृष्ट शैक्षणिक प्रदर्शन और मिले अन्य सभी योग्यता विज्ञापित. पर सुनवाई के छात्र की दुर्दशा, एसोसिएट प्रोफेसर झोउ Weibao सख्ती से कार्रवाई करने का फैसला के रूप में, जियांग ताओ के कानूनी प्रतिनिधि है । में प्रशासनिक शिकायत प्रस्तुत प्रोफेसर झोउ, यह कहा गया था कि प्रतिवादी के विशिष्ट प्रशासनिक अधिनियम की भर्ती के राष्ट्रीय सिविल सेवकों के उल्लंघन पर वादी के समान अधिकार और राजनीतिक अधिकारों की सेवा करने के लिए एक राज्य के रूप में अंग कार्यकर्ता, सीमित करने के लिए अपनी पात्रता के लिए आवेदन है । वादी अदालत से अनुरोध किया की घोषणा करने के लिए प्रतिवादी के भेदभावपूर्ण प्रशासनिक अधिनियम के बारे में ऊंचाई, और अवैध रूप से करने के लिए प्रतिवादी के आदेश करने के लिए सार्वजनिक रूप से सही और रद्द ऊंचाई-भेदभावपूर्ण प्रतिबंध के आवेदन पर.

जनता की राय रखती है कि यह आवश्यक है और आवश्यक तैयार करने के लिए भौतिक आवश्यकताओं और मानकों के अनुरूप करने के लिए विशिष्ट विशेषताओं के साथ विभिन्न व्यवसायों और भविष्य उद्योगों. कानून की अनुमति देता है "के लिए विशेष आवश्यकताओं विशेष पदों के लिए," के रूप में ऊंचाई के प्रभावों को सीधे सामान्य रोजगार जैसे क्षेत्रों में सैन्य सेवा, पुलिस का काम है, और खेल. हालांकि, ऊंचाई है, जरूरी नहीं कि संबंधित बनने के लिए एक योग्य बैंक कर्मचारी. बैंक के निर्णय करने के लिए बाहर जियांग ताओ के आधार पर उसकी ऊंचाई का गठन किया अनुचित अंतर उपचार और इस प्रकार भेदभाव.

When societal aesthetics regarding height become skewed, leading to a series of unreasonable phenomena, the law needs to step in to correct this imbalance. This should be considered an effective social balancing mechanism.

मूल्य रैंकिंग

In fact, people’s concern about height is sometimes not just about “charm index,” but also involves competition for other interests.

For example, there is a concept called “the politics of height,” which mentions a significant correlation between the height comparisons of politicians and election results in Western televised debates. Statistics show that in the 16 US presidential elections since World War II, the taller candidate won 11 times, while the shorter candidate won only 4 times. In the UK general election, Cameron’s re-election was even seen as conforming to the “Prime Minister’s Height Law”: in the past 40 years, no male Prime Minister in Britain has been shorter than 180 cm. This shows that sometimes, height is an advantage. A survey asking people about their satisfaction with their height found that nearly 70% wished they weren’t “the way they are now.”

हालांकि, जबकि ऊंचाई बन गया है और अधिक मूल्यवान है, लोगों को हो सकता है पर पुनर्विचार करने की जरूरत के चेहरे में "घातक" स्वास्थ्य समस्याओं. सब के बाद, पोषण में सुधार लाता है न केवल वृद्धि की ऊंचाई, लेकिन यह भी एक वृद्धि में मोटापा और मोटापे से संबंधित रोगों.

Currently, there are more and more obese people and children, and lifestyle diseases are becoming increasingly prevalent. Some intractable diseases and diseases of the elderly are showing a trend of affecting younger people—all due to overnutrition. Taking Beijing as an example, the obesity detection rate among primary and secondary school students in the 2013-2014 school year was 15.6%, an increase of 2.6% compared to the previous year. We are clearly unprepared for this trend. The “Nutrition Improvement Regulations” are still in the draft stage. However, some countries abroad have already made significant progress. Japan enacted the Nutritionist Law in 1947, resulting in Japanese people over 40 being shorter than Chinese people on average, while Japanese people under 40 are taller than Chinese people on average. In 2009, Japan even enacted legislation specifically targeting waist circumference, prohibiting men from exceeding 85 centimeters and women from exceeding 80 centimeters; regardless of rank, anyone exceeding this limit was required to resign.

There’s a saying online: “You can be short, but you can’t be both fat and short.” From the perspective of the nation and the government, the issue of national physical fitness should be given high priority, and support should be provided for national fitness.